Thursday, August 13, 2009

First Meeting August 12

The first meeting of board members to discuss the superintendent selection process was held last night in Loxley. All board members except Wills were present and the meeting was facilitated by Sally Howell, executive director of the Alabama Association of School Boards.

Ms. Howell led us through a discussion of a process that focuses upon establishing goals for the system, attributes and abilities necessary to move the system towards those goals, timelines for getting things done. Among the challenges identified were:

  • Strong Financial Background
  • Credible experience in school setting
  • Strong personnel skills
  • The need for innovation in dealing with emerging challenges
  • Communication, Communication
Ms. Howell shared pros and cons of using search firms and consultants to assist with the process. Probably the point she made that most gave me pause was that the candidate pool would be diminished if we did not use a search firm because under Alabama law any resume submitted directly to the board is a public document.

We discussed whether to search at all, or just promote an "heir apparent". In that discussion sentiment was expressed by me and a couple of others that a search is in the best interest of the system even if a local candidate eventually emerges as the choice.

I am, quite frankly, very concerned that some members said that they did not see a purpose in a search but seemed rather to have already determined that one current employee should be chosen.

The discussion continued with Ms. Howell telling us that if we search we should define the extent of the search as statewide, regional, or national. Such a determination has an impact on advertisement and posting.

Ms. Howell stressed that we should not do a sham search, that is we shouldn't know we are going to appoint somebody and initiate a "search" to provide an air of legitimacy to the process. I couldn't agree more.

Ms. Howell then led us through discussion of the need for community input and suggested several formats and approaches that had worked elsewhere.

After the meeting formally ended there was additional discussion about naming a successor from within and avoiding the search process. I want the best superintendent we can find, but we cannot know who that person is unless we go through a genuine and sincere search. The challenges identified are enormous, the stakes are high, and the cost of a mistake or lost opportunity simply too great for us not to do what it takes to get the best.

There was no one from the public at our meeting to observe. Only two staff members attended. Not one principal or PTO or Foundation member was there. I am disappointed. Are you going to wait until you are invited to a "community event" or are you going to watch and monitor what we do and how we arrive at our decision? You could wake up one day soon and find out that a selection has been made and that there will not be any need for your input. Please don't sleep through this.

2 comments:

  1. As a parent of school age children, community member, business person and board member of one of the county's education foundations, i absolutely support an outside search for a new superintendent. I would like to see the BCBOE conduct its search similar to the process used to select a new president for Bishop State Community College in Mobile. A national search was conducted. Several community members of varying backgrounds and experience were asked to serve on the search committee, along with leaders from within the two-year college system. The public was invited to meet the final candidates, and I believe observe the interviews. It was a very professional, above-board process. Our communities, and especially our children, deserve nothing less.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It would seem to me that it would almost be a no brainer that a search was needed. Assuming that the new Superintendent had to have experience, (again a no brainer) we do not have anyone currently in the system with such experience. One of the Asst. Superintendents only has one year of experience in the job and the other has made mention multiple times she is ready to retire. That doesn't really leave anyone else that has the experience. You have the Directors, but they don't seem to be qualified, especially after what Ms. Howell said. Also, the one that may have the experience doesn't have the "personality" or "decision making" skills to handle the job. We would go from a great system to an "below average" system. I would like to see a National search formed, and would like to see an interview process like what Dr. Hollinger went through when he was interviewing for the job out of town. Have the "media" perform the interviews, there isn't anyone better that knows the communities and people. The Board members know there "districts" only and may also be trying to promote their own choice of a candidate. We don't want a redo of the "good ole boy/girl" network. There have been enough rumors with the current administration on that subject.

    ReplyDelete